Caution: JavaScript execution is disabled in your browser or for this website. You may not be able to answer all questions in this survey. Please, verify your browser parameters.

Cancer Core Europe // Virtual Workshop on RECIST - Feedback

Feedback Survey for the CCE Virtual Workshop on RECIST

CCE_logo


 

 

 

Dear participants, 

we are striving for the improvement of our event and would appreciate your help. We would like to ask you to give us feedback on the virtual CCE workshop on RECIST 2022 and to share your suggestions with us.

The survey will be anonymized and your answers will be used for internal purposes only. By participating in the survey, you are accepting these conditions. Please contact Tanja Jutzi (tanja.jutzi@nct-heidelberg.de) if you have any questions.

Did the workshop meet your expectations?
Please rate from 1 (not at all) to 5 (excellent)
Did the workshop cover relevant topics?
Please rate from 1 (not at all) to 5 (excellent)
Was there enough time with regards to the content?
Please rate from 1 (too short) to 5 (too long)
Will the workshop be of use for your work?
Please rate from 1 (not at all) to 5 (excellent)
Will you be able to apply the trained skills on your further research?
Please rate from 1 (not at all) to 5 (excellent)

Has the talk been informative, clear, up-to-date and well presented? Please rate from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). 

 
Chikako Suzuki: evaluation criteria – history and background
Ferry Lalezari: RECIST 1.1 - basic principles
Lennart Blomqvist: Modifications of RECIST – an overview
Chikako Suzuki: Imaging based evaluation of immune therapies
Vitali Grozman: Treatment side effect or progressive disease
Interactive quiz:
1 = poor; 2 = average; 3 = good; 4 = very good; 5=excellent. 

Please share any additional comments or suggestions. What should be covered in more/less details? What did you miss?

Would you recommend the CCE RECIST Workshop to others?